Writing A Thesis Statement About Jefferson Vs Hamilton

Writing A Thesis Statement About Jefferson Vs Hamilton-69
On the other hand, the magnitude and difficulty of the trust to which the voice of my country called me, being sufficient to awaken in the wisest and most experienced of her citizens a distrustful scrutiny into his qualifications, could not but overwhelm with despondence one who (inheriting inferior endowments from nature and unpracticed in the duties of civil administration) ought to be peculiarly conscious of his own deficiencies.In this conflict of emotions all I dare aver is that it has been my faithful study to collect my duty from a just appreciation of every circumstance by which it might be affected. Passive voice often creates unclear, less direct, wordy sentences, whereas active voice creates clearer, more concise sentences.

On the other hand, the magnitude and difficulty of the trust to which the voice of my country called me, being sufficient to awaken in the wisest and most experienced of her citizens a distrustful scrutiny into his qualifications, could not but overwhelm with despondence one who (inheriting inferior endowments from nature and unpracticed in the duties of civil administration) ought to be peculiarly conscious of his own deficiencies.In this conflict of emotions all I dare aver is that it has been my faithful study to collect my duty from a just appreciation of every circumstance by which it might be affected. Passive voice often creates unclear, less direct, wordy sentences, whereas active voice creates clearer, more concise sentences.

Tags: Research Paper On Image ProcessingTd Canada Trust Personal Net Worth StatementReference In Research PaperBest Thesis Writing BooksExamples Of Introduction In Research PaperGothic Architecture Research PapersPediatric Nurse Practitioner Personal Statement

All I dare hope is that if, in executing this task, I have been too much swayed by a grateful remembrance of former instances, or by an affectionate sensibility to this transcendent proof of the confidence of my fellow-citizens, and have thence too little consulted my incapacity as well as disinclination for the weighty and untried cares before me, my error will be palliated by the motives which mislead me, and its consequences be judged by my country with some share of the partiality in which they originated.” Washington would have been even more reluctant to lead the country had he understood the running quarrel between the secretary of the Treasury and the secretary of State that he would be expected to umpire and on which he would eventually take sides.

Washington wanted to set a good example by appointing the best people to his administration – so it was natural that Washington (57) would choose two of the most talented young Americans he knew – Alexander Hamilton (32) and Thomas Jefferson (46) to serve with him.

(Only after the adoption of the Twelfth Amendment in 1804 did electors vote separately and specifically for president and vice president.) The presidential election of 1800 provided Alexander Hamilton, former secretary of the treasury, with a dilemma: a tie between Thomas Jefferson, a man whose principles were in direct opposition to Hamilton's own, and Aaron Burr, a man Hamilton believed to have no principles at all.

As the House of Representatives prepared to vote to break the deadlock, Hamilton conducted a furious letter-writing campaign to urge fellow Federalists to vote for Jefferson.

Historian Jay Winik wrote: “Since there were only three departments, each secretary wielded considerable power; they were the government.

Moreover, Washington’s cabinet members lacked clearly delineated lines of authority and often worked at cross purposes, frequently interfering with one another’s tasks.” Hamilton and Jefferson fought in two primary arenas – economic and diplomatic – but the two areas were related and the differences were exacerbated by the attempts of each to intervene in the primary sphere of the other.It is true, in such a fallible state of existence and from the want of a competent knowledge of character I may err; but my errors in my nominations shall be such as result from the head – and not from the heart.” Commemorating Washington’s life after his death in December 1799, Massachusetts Congressman Fisher Ames spoke of Washington as one of "that small number" of men "who were no less distinguished for the elevation of their virtues than the luster of their talents..were born, and who acted through life as if they were born, not for themselves, but for their country and the whole human race." Echoing the young officers who served with Washington in his youth, Ames said that, even as a young man, Washington had "acquired a maturity of judgment, rare in age, unparalleled in youth.Perhaps no young man had so early laid up a life’s stock of materials for solid reflection, or settled so soon the principles and habits of his conduct" Writing of Washington during the first year of his administration, Abigail Adams wrote that President Washington “has so happy a faculty of appearing to accommodate & yet carrying his point, that if he was not really one of the best intentioned men in the world he might be a very dangerous one.Nothing but the critical situation of his country would have induced him to so hazardous a conduct.” Washington received notification of his election from John Langdon, president pro tempore of the Senate of his election as president on April 14.Two days later, he left Virginia for New York, arriving on April 23. Washington had been working on a suitable inaugural speech for some time.But my knowledge of the characters of persons, through an extent of fifteen hundred miles, must be so imperfect as to make me liable to fall into mistakes: which, in fact, can only be avoided by the disinterested aid of my coadjutors.I forbear to enlarge on the delicacy there certainly will be, in discharging this part of our trust with fidelity, and without giving occasion for uneasiness.“I have no wish which aspires beyond the humble and happy lot of living and dying a private citizen on my own farm.” Washington wrote: “I clearly foresaw the endless jealousies, and, possibly, the fatal consequences, to which a government, depending altogether on the good will of the people for its establishment, would certainly be exposed in its early stages.Besides, I thought, whatever the effect might be in pleasing or displeasing any individuals at the present moment, a due concern for my own reputation not less decisively than a sacred regard to the interests of the Community, required that I should hold myself absolutely at liberty to act, while in office, with a sole reference to justice and the public good.However, a strategy of cooptation provides an equally plausible explanation.Jefferson already had a substantial personal following, especially in the southern states.”9 In such a small cabinet, the potential for administrative overlap was great.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Writing A Thesis Statement About Jefferson Vs Hamilton

The Latest from zaym-kartu.ru ©