Knowledge of how successful arguments are structured, then—as well as of the different ways they may fall apart—is a useful tool for both academic reading and writing.
If you are writing an annotated bibliography or literature review, for instance, being able to recognize logical flaws in others‘ arguments may enable you to critique the validity of claims, research results, or even theories in a particular text.
Being attentive to logical fallacies in others‘ writings will make you a more effective "critic" and writer of literature review assignments, annotated bibliographies and article critiques.
Being attentive to fallacies in your own writing will help you build more compelling arguments, whether putting together a dissertation prospectus or simply writing a short discussion post on the applications of a particular theory.
If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.
What Are Fallacies In Critical Thinking
If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.and *.are unblocked.
For the most part, the claims you will be making in academic writing will be claims of fact.
Therefore, examples presented below will highlight fallacies in this type of claim.
Logical fallacies are errors of reasoning—specific ways in which arguments fall apart due to faulty connection making.
While logical fallacies may be used intentionally in certain forms of persuasive writing (e.g., in political speeches aimed at misleading an audience), fallacies tend to undermine the credibility of objective scholarly writing.