I also feel that he should calculate the inventory holding cost, and I am also curious to know what the cost of oil deterioration is and if there are transportation costs involved.
These additional costs could be very significant in adding to the costs that Hall has already predicted.
Hall concludes that the policies reflected in the NES will result in gross economic inefficiency.
I agree with Hall’s conclusion that misplaced investment in such a large part of our economy is dangerous.
Although Hall mentions the opportunity cost of interest that could have been earned had the amount spent been invested, he does not attempt to quantify what that amount is.
I would attempt to calculate these costs using various interest rates.It specifies the purpose of the study and its background information but does not provide any data regarding the methods, results, and conclusions.This one is a smaller version of a critical review.I believe that there should be more of an analysis concerning how varying oil prices can affect the costs associated with oil import spending.This would show how vulnerable oil import spending is relative to price changes.Based on the impression it leaves, they will decide whether your paper is worth viewing or not. However, there are four other types that you should be aware of, which makes it five: This one is a more concise version of an abstract that must draw the reader's attention from the first sentence.It should be worded in simple terms, convey the nature of the research, show the most significant findings, and sum up the contribution of the study.The philosophy of the administration is to rely on market prices to determine 20% of the economy’s investment.However, misplaced investments based on such a policy have implications for many years.The sample abstract that follows is a solid model written for a class in mineral policy analysis.Given the pre-determined rhetorical context, no time is wasted, and paragraphs are kept both short and detailed.