Tags: Essays On Bilingualism In CanadaHigh School Science Essay S 2013Michigan State Application EssayRelationships Between Parents And Teenagers EssaySamah El-Tantawy DissertationUniversity Michigan Admissions EssayHow To Write An Essay ReviewModels For Writers Short Essays For Composition
With regard to coaching level, 25 (0.15) were junior high coaches, 99 (0.61) high school, and 38 (0.24) at the college level.While this is a good sample size, the problem lies with the distribution of the sample.
In general, females scored much higher than did the male coaches.
A MANOVA was also used to examine the data for differences between the three levels of coaching (junior high, high school, and college) with regard to leadership behavior in general.
Here is a really good example of a scholary research critique written by a student in EDRS 6301.
The student who submitted this paper last semester earned a 100 on his critique. A succint summary is provided in the first paragraph.
Again, because the data for the RLSS is ordinal, an ANOVA is not the best analysis tool.
The three coaching levels scored differently on three of the six behaviors: democratic behaviors, training and instruction, and social support.
However, due to the nonrandom nature of the sample, the results would not generalizable beyond the 162 participants in the study. In order to reduce threats to internal validity, the participants were asked to respond honestly and confidentiality was stressed so that the coaches might feel more at ease in responding. The researchers mention that the scales were given in a variety of settings.
This could present a threat to the internal validity in that participants might not have been entirely focused on completing the scale, but instead on coordinating practice, completing paperwork, etc.
This is not consistent with the type of data collected.
The RLSS used a Likert scale (ordinal), yet a MANOVA would be most applicable for normally distributed, quantitative data.