Establish the writer’s reason (point of view) for reviewing the literature; explain the criteria to be used in analyzing and comparing literature and the organization of the review (sequence); and, when necessary, state why certain literature is or is not included (scope).Tags: Parable Of The Democracy Of Goods EssaysAdvantages Of Science In Our Daily Life EssayAssignment EvaluationEssay On Nepal On The World MapRelaxing At The Beach EssayExplain Thesis EssayExtended Essays In PhysicsDemocracy Essay PakistanEssay Comparing And Contrasting Judaism And ChristianityEssays On Friedrich Nietzsche
Summarize individual studies or articles with as much or as little detail as each merits according to its comparative importance in the literature, remembering that space (length) denotes significance.
Provide the reader with strong “umbrella” sentences at beginnings of paragraphs, “signposts” throughout, and brief “so what” summary sentences at intermediate points in the review to aid in understanding comparisons and analyses.
The following collection of annotated sample literature reviews written and co-written by colleagues associated with UW-Madison showcases how these reviews can do different kind of work for different purposes.
Use these successful examples as a starting point for understanding how other writers have approached the challenging and important task of situating their idea in the context of established research.
To learn more about literature reviews, take a look at our workshop on Writing Literature Reviews of Published Research.
Review Of Related Literature For Satisfaction Bplan Business Plan
An important strategy for learning how to compose literature reviews in your field or within a specific genre is to locate and analyze representative examples.
In the conclusion, you should: Summarize major contributions of significant studies and articles to the body of knowledge under review, maintaining the focus established in the introduction.
Evaluate the current “state of the art” for the body of knowledge reviewed, pointing out major methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies in theory and findings, and areas or issues pertinent to future study.
The objective of this review is to render all available constructive literature about students’ satisfaction with a sound theoretical and empirical background.
Data were collected from refereed journals and conference papers, and are constructively analyzed from different point of views to filter a sound background for future studies.