The reason to celebrate these schools and the role they play is because the traditional system has been downright hostile to the needs of such striving children and families…tracking or ability grouping is seen as elitist; any effort to provide special classes, environments, or challenges for motivated or high-achieving kids is cast as perpetuating inequality—, and even though there’s a ton of evidence that high achievers do best around other high achievers.And now these “social justice” types want to berate schools for asking disruptive students to leave.Tags: Research Papers On Waste Heat RecoveryProblem Solving Examples For KidsTerm Paper In SwineSmall Farm Business Plan SamplePurpose Of Essay On ManOedipus Essay HighRelationship Between Critical Thinking And Reading StrategiesPast Papers Intermediate Part 2 Rawalpindi BoardMit Mechanical Engineering Coursework
Education programs should cultivate independent thinkers who can formulate creative solutions to novel problems rather than training text-dependent thinkers who can answer standardized text-based questions.
David Coleman has made it clear that Common Core students are expected to remain tethered to the text and read like a detective while most employers expect their workers to be autonomous learners as they read with perspective.
Much of the text they encounter in school and work will not be “rich and worthy” of close reading.
College students and employees will often be required to make decisions and determine a course of action using vague, conflicting, or even incomplete data that is derived from a variety of sources.
Wasn’t the rationale for adoption of the Common Core that higher standards would serve as an academic rising tide that will lift all boats regardless of condition, design, or years at sea?
Or is it possible that the Common Core, which lacks meaningful career and technical standards or pathways, is intentionally designed to prepare cognitively privileged and standardized students for college and post-college careers while the “marginal” learners in our schools will be encouraged to apply at Dave and Buster’s?Paul Bruno, a supporter of the Common Core responded to this concern…And it’s also likely that, Common Core notwithstanding, our dropout rates will increase in the coming years since they are currently at an all-time low and an improving economy will give marginal students better alternatives outside of school.But in life there are trade-offs, and I would be willing to accept a somewhat less ideal outcome for the most-challenged students if it meant tremendously better life outcomes for their peers.It is odd that reformers who fervently support the Common Core with its mandate of college and career readiness for ALL students would express views that excuse the most challenged segments of our student population from meeting these higher standards.Fordham Institute has expressed views on preparing ALL students for college and the discipline of at-risk learners that also seem contrary or inconsistent with his enthusiastic support for the K-12 college prep for all approach of the Common Core.What if encouraging students to take a shot at the college track—despite very long odds of crossing its finish line—does them more harm than good?To be sure, this raises tough questions for the system as a whole.As I said in the video, there are reasons to be concerned that district schools will become the last resort for the toughest-to-serve kids.The Common Core demands students think critically while staying connected and diving into text, yet employers desire workers who can think creatively while connecting with people as they dive into their work.In college and careers students will often face the challenge of answering open-ended questions rather than text-dependent ones.